Supplementary Material 0.19

Chapter 0 – Steady-State Hydraulics

MainPreviousNext

Surge Analysis and the Wave Plan Method

Supplementary Material: Example Problems and Solutions

Chapter 0 – Problem 0.19

0.19 Consider the classic three-reservoir problem shown in the following figure:

The length, diameter, and Hazen-William roughness coefficients of the pipeline are:

  1.  From A to J: 200 m, 500 mm, and 100, respectively
  2. From J to B: 2000 m, 500 mm, and 100, respectively.
  3. From J to C: 400 m, 200 mm, and 140, respectively.

The hydraulic grades at reservoirs A, B, and C are 200 m, 180 m, and 185 m, respectively. Compute the steady-state flowrates in all three pipelines, neglecting minor losses.

Solution:

Assuming the flow is from reservoir A to junction node J, and from junction J to reservoirs B and C, there are three unknown flowrates: QAJ, QJB, and QJC.This requires three non-redundant equations to solve for the three unknown flowrates:

Eq. 1.   Energy equation between reservoirs A and B:

EA – ΔHAJ – ΔHJB = EB

Eq.2.   Energy equation between reservoirs A and C:

EB – ΔHAJ – ΔHJC = EC

Eq. 3.   Continuity equation at junction J:

QAJ = QJB + QJC

Substituting the appropriate Hazen-William expressions for ΔH terms:

EA – (10.67 LAJ QAJ1.852)/(CAJ1.852 DAJ4.87) – (10.67 LJB QJB1.852)/(CJB1.852 DJB4.87) = EB

EA – (10.67 LAJ QAJ1.852)/(CAJ1.852 DAJ4.87) – (10.67 LJC QJC1.852)/(CJC1.852 DJC4.87) = EC

QAJ = QJB + QJC

The only unknowns in the above three equations are QAJ, QJB, and QJC.

Solve these equations iteratively to obtain the following results:  QAJ = 0.433 m3/s, QJB = 0.346 m3/s, and QJC =0.087 m3/s.


Summary of revisions to this page:

Date/Revision